Acquisition Notes

Acquisition Notes

A $100 Table and a $20,000 Table Both Hold Objects

Here Is Why One Commands 200x the Price

Aug 07, 2026
∙ Paid

Written by Samuel Valente

The buyer is never purchasing the product. They are purchasing the dream outcome behind it. The founders who understand this stop pricing against cost and start pricing against what the outcome is actually worth.

YouTube Thumbnail Downloader FULL HQ IMAGE

Acquisition Notes is a reader-supported publication. To unlock paywalled posts and support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Most businesses in crowded markets make the same mistake.

They look at what the competition is doing, identify the price point that seems to be winning, and position themselves as a slightly better version of the same thing at a slightly lower cost. Then they wonder why growth requires constant discounting and why customers leave the moment someone cheaper appears.

The problem is not the product, it is the framing of the competitive question. You are asking how to beat the competition on the terms the competition set. That is a race you cannot win, because on a long enough timeline, the lowest-cost operator always wins a price war, and you are almost certainly not the lowest-cost operator.

The correct question is not how to compete, it’s how to make the comparison irrelevant.

There is a principle that separates businesses that command premium from businesses that apologize for their price in every sales conversation. That principle is the decommoditization of the customer experience, and it applies to every product or service, including the ones most commonly described as impossible to differentiate.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Acquisition Notes.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Samuel Valente · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture